🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy worked, and disclosed fresh requests had come from mediators to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a difficult route since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states used their right to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if talks reopen.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the ultimate answer to resolve conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."